September 2021 – The "True" North

Emancipate yourself from mental slavery: stop caring about pro sports

The title of this post is based on the great line from Bob Marley’s 1980 classic, Redemption Song, “Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds.”

According to the Wikipedia article on the song, Marley took these lines from a speech Marcus Garvey gave at Menelik Hall in Sydney, Nova Scotia, during October 1937 and published in his magazine, The Black Man:

“We are going to emancipate ourselves from mental slavery because whilst others might free the body, none but ourselves can free the mind. Mind is your only ruler, sovereign. The man who is not able to develop and use his mind is bound to be the slave of the other man who uses his mind.”

The minds behind the pro sports marketing machine have made slaves of millions of intelligent people. But they haven’t done it by forcing people to stop developing or using their minds. They’ve done it, and continue to do it, in ways that train people to think certain ways about certain things – and not to think about certain other things at all.

The Machine gets millions of people to care (many of them deeply for years) about whether millionaires playing for billionaires win games and titles. The Machine does this by training fans to do a number of key things:

Cheer for the “home” team, meaning the team representing the city or country they live in;
See the athletes as people very much like them who care about their communities; and
Never think about team owners, who are almost all billionaires.

As most fans appear to do the first two things without ever thinking twice about why, let’s take a closer look at them…

It makes perfect sense why we cheer for amateur home teams like our kids’ teams. But very few of us or our kids have ever played for professional teams so why do we cheer on professional “home” teams? Some people would argue that’s just as natural as cheering for our kids’ teams. It’s not…

We cheer our kids’ (or nephews’ or nieces’) teams because we know and love our kids and want them to succeed. Part of this is because their success is literally a reflection on us because so much of who they are and what they do is due to us. This isn’t at all the case with pro teams and athletes. The only influence fans have on pro athletes performance is how loud they yell in the stands – and we all know that has mixed results. So why are so many people more emotionally invested in pro athletes’ victories than some parents are in their own kids’ wins? Because they’ve been trained to be.

Why should we cheer for a pro team simply because we live in the same city or country – especially when many of the athletes aren’t from the same city or country? Most people don’t know the names of most of the players on the pro teams they cheer for let alone anything about them beyond how well they they play. So if we don’t actually know (or therefore care) about the individual players, then what exactly are we cheering for?

In his 2012 article in Maryland’s Capital Gazette, Psychology: Rooting for your favorite team is good for you, Scott Smith offers some insights. Smith says research has shown that people root for a sports team for many different reasons including being socialized into it by family and friends or simply liking or identifying with the name of the team, the color or style of their uniform, or their winning ways. He also says:

“It was long theorized that those who avidly root for sports teams are lonely, alienated people who suffer from low self-esteem and have no real social ties to meet their emotional needs. Research, however, is showing that just the opposite is true. A study at the University of Kansas found that sports fans are happier and actually suffer fewer bouts of depression and report lower levels of alienation than people who are not interested in sports. In fact, most sports fans are high functioning, well educated and successful people – how else could they even afford a ticket at today’s prices!” (Smith doesn’t include the links to the University of Kansas study.) So Smith offers some ideas why people cheer for teams and some evidence that doing so has some benefits.

Neither Smith nor any of the articles I found online mentioned sports marketing as something that might influence why people cheer for their home team, or any team. It seems sports marketing is so effective that everyone has joined their home team. Even NPR (National Public Radio), that doesn’t shy away from uncomfortable topics, only had articles talking mostly about how sports marketing works – but not critiquing it. The first NPR item that came up when I Googled “NPR “sports marketing” was NPR’s The Business Side podcast, “Sports Marketing pioneer Jim Host & The Birth Of ‘The Bundle'”.

This lack of articles is a pretty big omission considering pro sports are billion dollar industries with corresponding marketing budgets.

In addition to training us to cheer for a home team full of millionaires we know nothing about, the Machine also trains us to see those millionaires as just normal folk who care about “their” communities and to rarely, if ever, think about their billionaire owners.

We see heart warming media stories about athletes visiting children in hospital and many of these athletes are no doubt sincere in their concern for the kids. However, what we almost never see or hear is athletes doing anything about or commenting on any social issue in the community – unless the issue has first gained popular support. For example, some athletes, like NHL star Sidney Crosby, joined millions of others in condemning racial injustice following George Floyd’s murder. However, most of the time, most athletes keep their heads down and their mouths shut. Is that what someone who really cares about their community does?

Now, it’s not hard to imagine why athletes stay silent when they see what happens to people like NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick when they speak out – or take a knee. Kaepernick played six seasons for the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers. In 2016, he knelt during the national anthem at the start of NFL games in protest of police brutality and racial inequality in the United States – and never played in the NFL again. In November 2017, he filed a grievance against the NFL and its owners, accusing them of colluding to keep him out of the league. Kaepernick withdrew the grievance in February 2019 after reaching a confidential settlement with the NFL.

So athletes, even if they wanted to speak out, are forced into silence and inaction with threats of dismissal. So, in the absence of hearing from the athletes themselves, the Machine is able to sell us an image of them as just hard-working guys who take time from their busy schedule to visit sick kids (and it’s all guys because I’m referring to the Machine behind the NHL, NFL, NBA and MLB).

And while the Machine has us thinking the athletes are just great guys very much like us (well, except the exceptional athletic ability part) – it trains us to never think about the billionaires who own the teams for which the athletes we love play.

So what do we know about these folks who we help make boatloads of cash?

Well, one thing that shouldn’t be surprising is that, to become, and stay, billionaires, they do whatever they can to lower their taxes. In fact, according to a July 2021 ProPublica article, The Billionaire Playbook: How Sports Owners Use Their Teams to Avoid Millions in Taxes, billionaire owners like NBA Los Angeles Clippers owner and former Microsoft executive Steve Balmer, legally use tax laws to pay lower tax rates than players and even stadium workers. Does it being legal make it right?

One way owners use all those tax savings is donating to political parties. According to an Oct. 2020 ESPN article, American professional sports owners contributed nearly $47 million in U.S. federal elections since 2015, including $10 million to Republican causes and $1.9 million to Democratic causes by the time the article was posted in October in the run up to the Nov. 2020 election. That strong Republican lean is consistent with owners’ spending in the 2018 and 2016 federal elections as well. ESPN’s research on principal owners, controlling owners, co-owners and commissioners from the NBA, NFL, NHL, WNBA, MLB and NASCAR revealed they donated $34.2 million (72.9%) to Republican campaigns or super PACs purely supporting Republican causes, compared to $10.1 million (21.5%) to Democrats over the past three elections. The research includes more than 160 owners and commissioners spanning 125 teams.

So the next time you think about buying that ticket to see that big game in person or you catch a game on TV munching away through the really expensive ads, remember who’s pockets you’ve helping fill…and remember Bob Marley’s words.

Note: One week after posting this I got an email from LeadNow asking Canadians to sign a petition to STOP RICH TAX CHEATS. CLOSE TAX LOOPHOLES. The petition followed the release of the Pandora Papers which revealed that at least 500 wealthy Canadians have been hiding money and dodging taxes in offshore tax-havens.

Federal election polls currently predict a minority Liberal or Conservative government on Sept. 20 and that’s good for Black Canadians as minority governments have a history of delivering things that have been – and in many cases still are – good for Black folks. Here are some, paraphrased from a great 2019 Policy Options article by Geoff Norquay.

The Lester B. Pearson minorities (1963-65 and 1965-68)

“Supported by the NDP, Pearson’s Liberals put in place a bounty of progressive programs and initiatives, including universal coverage of hospitalization and medicare, the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans, the Canada Assistance Plan, the Canada Student Loans program…and groundbreaking labour legislation that pioneered the 40-hour work week.” As many Black Canadians face economic challenges partly due to systemic anti-Black racism, they needed programs like Medicare and the Canada Student Loans Program more than others. As part of the economic challenge was being in low paid jobs with few protections, the 40-hour work week also benefited them more.

The Pierre Elliot Trudeau minority (1972-74)

“The Trudeau government amended the Elections Act to regulate election expenses for the first time. This was landmark legislation that established most of the principles still at the heart of Canada’s party financing regulatory regime: a tax credit system for donations, disclosure of donations over $100 and reimbursement for political parties’ election expenses. Limits were also placed on the amounts that candidates and parties were allowed to spend on campaigns.” As these changes curbed the power of big business to influence elections, it helped Black folks because big business then, as now, isn’t controlled by Black folks. The problem now, is that Big Tech businesses make money by allowing disinformation that affects elections in ways that haven’t benefited Black folks.

The Joe Clark minority (1979-80)

“Despite its short time in power, the Clark government can claim at least partial credit for one significant policy advance, Canada’s first access-to-information legislation. Clark’s Bill C-15, to create the Freedom of Information Act, established a broad right of access to government records.” Under the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act, the right to submit Access to Information and Privacy requests, or ATIPs, is one of the most powerful tools Black folks have to confront discrimination they face from the federal government or federally regulated workplaces. That’s because documenting discriminatory treatment is essential to ending it. Information requests only cost $5 and privacy requests (i.e. information dealing personally with you) are free. Provinces have their own versions. Black folks in Ontario can use the province’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act to get information from the Ontario government or places it regulates. Regulated organizations include the Canadian and Ontario human rights commissions.

The Paul Martin minority (2004-06)

“Early in the Martin government, the Prime Minister reached a 10-year deal with the provinces and territories to increase federal health care funding by $41 billion, to lower their cost pressures and reduce wait times for essential services. The federal commitment included a 6-percent annual increase in federal transfers. A divisive and years-long debate was concluded with the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2005.” Any improvement to healthcare disproportionately benefits Black folks because many Black folks have health issues related to the economic challenges flowing from systemic anti-Black racism. Legalizing same sex marriage directly benefited Black LQBTQ2+ folks – which was particularly important since homophobia was, and still is, an issue in Black communities as in the larger society.

The Stephen Harper minorities (2006-08 and 2008-11)

“When the government’s 2008 fall economic update failed to announce stimulus measures in the face of the rapidly developing world credit crisis and recession, the opposition leaders threatened to topple the government. The Liberals and the NDP proposed a coalition government supported by the Bloc Québécois. After several days of crisis, Harper secured a highly controversial prorogation [pause] from the Governor General. A notable Harper accomplishment was his eventual response to the…financial crisis. Chastened by their recent near-death experience at the hands of the opposition and forced to play against their conservative fiscal instincts, Harper and his finance minister, Jim Flaherty, [included in the 2009 budget] $40 billion in stimulus and $20 billion in personal income tax cuts…taking the country sharply into deficit. The government’s aggressive response enabled the Canadian economy to recover more quickly and come out of the recession stronger than other G7 countries.

At the 2010 G8 Summit hosted by Canada, the Conservatives launched a signature commitment to the summit’s initiative on maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). Starting with a leadership pledge of $2.85 billion for 2010-15, the government followed up with an additional $3.5-billion commitment for 2015-20.” Just as with the COVID pandemic, Black folks were disproportionately negatively impacted by the global financial crisis so they would have benefited more than many from these measures to address it. Improvements to maternal health would also disproportionately help Black women since the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that, in pre-pandemic times, Black women in the U.S. died of pregnancy-related causes at a rate three times higher than white women, and Black babies were twice as likely to die before reaching their first birthday than white babies, regardless of the mother’s income or education level. According to a 2020 Huffington Post article by Eternity E Martis, because Canada doesn’t collect race-based health data, we don’t have an accurate picture of Black maternal mortality in this country. The Liberal government’s 2021 budget included almost $200 million over five years for Statistics Canada to collect data on “diverse populations, and support the government’s, and society’s, efforts to address systemic racism, gender gaps.” It’s crucial that include health data.

Minority governments, both Liberal and Conservative, have delivered lots of good stuff for Black Canadians and can be expected to continue doing so. Majority government have delivered some good things too like the 1977 Canadian Human Rights Act and the 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, both enacted by Pierre Trudeau majorities, but minority governments have delivered much more according to my (limited) research.

So Black folks need to discard the idea that voting for a candidate of a party that has little chance of gaining power is a “wasted vote” because, in a minority government, that party could end up holding the balance of power. Black folks can then push all parties to deliver the goods with a higher chance of success.