Categories
Guiding Council Mental health

Alternative mental health crisis response system pilot won’t prevent people from ending up dead

On June 27, the City of Ottawa’s Community Services Committee approved a pilot project for an alternative mental health crisis response system that is supposed to be safer, especially for those in crisis. However, the Safer Alternatives for Mental Health and Substance Use Crises Response system won’t make anyone safer – it will lead to more people being killed.

The system was proposed by the Guiding Council and Mental and Addictions which was created by the Ottawa Police Service and the OPS is a member. When we and our community partners saw that, we immediately suspected that, with OPS influence, the Guiding Council would recommend an alternative mental health response system that did three things:

  • Leave the door open to continue dangerous levels of police involvement;
  • Wouldn’t involve taking any money from the police budget; and
  • Would take a really long time to implement.

And all three have come true.

First, the Guiding Council’s terms of reference says it aims for a system that will still send cops, “when the crisis is linked to criminal activity”. Well, that would include a situation like Abdirahman Abdi, a Black man with mental health issues who died in 2016 following police intervention. People called the cops on him because he was allegedly touching women in a coffee shop. And it would also include a situation like Greg Ritchie, an Indigenous man with mental health issues who people called the cops on because they said they saw a man with a knife that turned out to be a ceremonial tomahawk. Abdi and Greg would end up just as dead under the system currently being proposed by the Guiding Council – despite the OPS agreeing to initiate a mental health response strategy as part of the settlement reached with Abdi’s family.

Second, not a cent of the $2.5 million estimated project cost will come from the police budget. 

Furthermore, the City has tasked the police with seeking permanent funding for the program from other levels of government. That’s like if there was a security team in the mental health wing of a hospital that was killing people they were called to help so the hospital administration finally said, “Ok, ok. The people we send you to help keep ending up dead so we’re going to give that job to a new temporary team. But don’t worry – we’re going to keep paying you anyway…and, oh, can you ask other levels of governments for funding for a permanent program?”

And third, it took the Guiding Council two years to get to this point despite community-led efforts producing a report containing a complete template for a non-police mental health crisis response system in May 2021.  However, the report the Guiding Council presented to City Council – including the literature review – didn’t mention the report that the 613-819 Black Hub and Vivic Research published in June 2021 laying out a template for a system very similar to the Guiding Council’s proposal, but with one big difference: the Hub’s report recommended the absolute minimum police involvement in the new system.

Adding to these concerns is the fact that the Guiding Council developed the plan for the three-year pilot project with little transparency, including not holding their meetings publicly or making their meeting minutes public. We got their meeting minutes through Freedom of Information and they revealed why the level of police involvement the Guiding Council is permitting in their new system is so dangerous. 

The minutes included a story about an incident that happened while Guiding Council staff were interviewing Indigenous people in the market with an outreach worker from a local community group. The minutes said, “Two [Ottawa Police Service] members came into the group quite aggressively, and after a few minutes handcuffed an Indigenous man (most members of the group were Indigenous). [The outreach worker] advocated for the police to act appropriately and was himself arrested for obstruction.” 

It’s unclear how the current Guiding Council members were chosen but it’s telling that it doesn’t include any of the groups that are the strongest critics of the Ottawa Police Service…like the 613-819 Black Hub, Horizon Ottawa, the Coalition Against More Surveillance, the Criminalization and Punishment Education Project, the Ottawa Black Diaspora Coalition, the Asilu Collective or Justice for Abdirahman.

If the City really wants to help people experiencing mental health crises, instead of continuing to contribute to them being harmed or killed, it will send the pilot project back for revision with an expanded Guiding Council that includes truly grassroots voices.

Categories
Blackademics Blacktivists Mental health Police

Mental health Blackademics add to Blacktivist toolkit

My post How Blackademics and Blacktivists can support each other said producing research Blacktivists can use for advocacy is one of the main ways Blackademics can help Blacktivists. Another way Blackademics can help is by holding conferences to share that research.

Last week I attended a conference on the theme of Mental Health of Black Communities: Overcoming Obstacles, Bridging the Gaps where mental health Blackademics, mostly from North America, shared their research.

The lead organizer of the conference was Dr. Jude Mary Cénat, an Associate Professor in the University of Ottawa’s School of Psychology and Chair of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health. Cénat is Director of the Vulnerability, Trauma, Resilience & Culture (V-TRaC) Research Laboratory, and holds the Research Chair on Black Health at the University of Ottawa. 

There were sessions on the problems with “color blind” approaches to mental health, the social determinants and racial issues affecting Black folks’ mental health, anti-Black racism in the child welfare system and lots more. (For more sessions, see the full conference program.) 

As a full time Blacktivist, my goal in attending the conference was to get direction on where to most effectively advocate to help improve Black folks’ mental health across Canada – and it didn’t take long to get what I came for! In his opening Wednesday keynote address, Achieving Black Mental Health Equity, Dr. Kwame McKenzie called for the creation of a federal Black Equity Act that would make Black equity a federally legal requirement. The call for such an act supports Blacktivists’ existing demand for the federal government to appoint a Black Equity Commissioner similar to the ones it announced for antisemitism and Islamophobia in the 2022 federal Budget. 

On Day 2, in her session Promoting Health Equity: Mental Health of Black Canadians. Mobilizing, Partnerships: Taking Steps Together for Supported Reintegration, Dr. Barbara-Ann Hamilton-Hench said Black communities need to challenge the federal Tri-Council to remove barriers to funding high quality research about and by Black people, and to fund Black researchers. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) make up the Tri-Council funding agencies. They are the primary mechanism through which the Government of Canada supports research and training at post-secondary institutions and are supposed to support and promote high-quality research in a wide variety of disciplines and areas. This supports the work the 613-819 Black Hub had already begun regarding SSHRC. 

In 2021, we discovered the Ottawa Police Service attempting to continue to try to deploy more cops in the community under the guise of the Neighborhood Resource Team program, which is their latest name for “community policing”. The OPS NRT program had ballooned from $2.5 million and 18 officers in 2019 to over $11 million and 89 officers in 2021. And the OPS was leading an evaluation of the program that was pretty much guaranteed to conclude that the program was great and should be further expanded. The project started in fall 2019 when the OPS hired Carleton professor Linda Duxbury to lead it. After we found out about the project, we met with Duxbury and asked her why no Black groups were included in the project description for her project on the SSHRC website (SSHRC gave her almost $200,000 for the project). She said she had included Indigenous groups. As Duxbury had done a very flawed study of the Peel Regional Police’s School Resource Officer program, we brought that to the attention of the Ottawa police, who said the report was one of the reasons they hired Duxbury. We then filed a complaint with Carleton University’s Research Ethics Board who found no issues with Duxbury. Finally, we filed a complaint with SSHRC who also backed Duxbury. However, after we continued to press Duxbury to do proper research by including the voices of Black and Indigenous people in her NRT report, she and the OPS, instead, canceled the 3-year, $260,000 project. We then took a look at SSHRC’s website and found it appeared to have no research on defunding or abolishing the police but several problematic studies related to police reform. Professor Hamilton-Hinch’s call has reinforced our commitment to challenging SSHRC on these issues.

One problem frequently raised at the conference, but for which few solutions were offered, was the lack of Black mental health professionals. (There was a session called Innovative Training Programmes for Mental Health Professionals on Issues Related to Cultural Safety and Addressing Experiences of Racism, by Ribbon Rouge Foundation Programs Director Dr. Selina Kunadu-Yiadom which may have covered this but I didn’t attend it.) In one session, they did show a CBC article titled Black psychologists say there are too few of them in Canada — and that’s a problem featuring photos of Ottawa-based psychotherapists Helen Ofosu and Kafui Sawyer. However, they didn’t share the main point of the article which was Black mental health care professionals highlighting problems in the accreditation process for psychological professionals as a key barrier to getting more Black ones. The article cited how, to become an accredited psychologist in Canada, students need to be accepted into a graduate program at a post-secondary institution or an internship program. Getting into a program depends on having a faculty member agree to be their supervisor but Ottawa-based psychotherapist Kafui Sawyer pointed out that the faculties are predominantly white and the students they’re recruiting or the students they have in [their] program are also predominantly white. Ofosu and Sawyer have formed a Black psychology section of the Canadian Psychology Association, which will advocate for more diversity in the profession.

Another area where Black students may be facing systemic barriers is getting scholarships. I recently acted as an assessor for the Loran Scholarship. The $100,000 award has existed since 1988 but no one I recently asked had heard of it. I only found out about it last year when our son applied for it – and didn’t make it past the first step, so wasn’t interviewed. One of Loran’s managers asked me to be an assessor to diversify their assessor pool and the training session I participated in showed why. Out of about 60 people, I was the only Black man (there were two Black women) and there was no one who identified as Indigenous. In the question period, I asked what percentage of assessors were Black or Indigenous men. The Loran exec leading the session said she didn’t know but would get me the info. I assessed 37 applications, none of which identified as Black or Indigenous men. The Loran application doesn’t have a self-identification option so you must infer who’s Black or Indigenous from what they write. We need to share info about such scholarships to get more Black students to apply – and more Black assessors.

But Black students will only encounter scholarship or accreditation issues if – and it’s a big if – they manage to make it through a systemically anti-Black education system – and avoid being caught in the systemically anti-Black “justice” system.

On that note, two of the most glaring omissions at the conference were any mention of the impact of policing on Black mental health or the role – and responsibilities – of the Ontario government in addressing the issues raised.

Considering health is largely provincial jurisdiction, this omission was notable. As a full time activist, I came away with little direction on where to advocate, and what to advocate for, at the provincial level. The Ontario government recently created a new Black Equity Branch and hired a director so we plan to work with that person to identify and address the changes needed at the provincial level.

As for policing, the word “police” wasn’t mentioned once in the conference program and there was only one session focussed on justice, called Justice and Mental Health. The 90 minute breakout session had four presentations only two of which were actually about justice: one on restorative justice and one on criminalization of Black refugees. 

Having a conference on Black mental health without a strong focus on the impact of policing is like having a conference on Black physical health without a strong focus on poverty. Canadian police, including in Ottawa where I live and lead the 613-819 Black Hub, continue to kill, or be involved in the deaths of, Black people experiencing mental crises. People who aren’t in crisis – yet – continue to have their mental health negatively impacted by sometimes violent interactions with police. Young Black and Indigenous Ottawa activists are still dealing with the mental impact of the Ottawa police arresting them after they blocked an intersection in November 2020 to protest the acquittal of Ottawa police constable Daniel Montsion in the 2016 beating death of Abdirahman Abdi (the police charged 12 of the about 30 protesters – then “stayed” the charges for one year, which meant that if any of the young people caused any “trouble”, the charges could be immediately reinstated.)

Next conference it would be good to see some research on things like the impact of layered policing on Black mental health. In his March 2021 Spring Magazine article Layered policing’ expands police amid calls to defund, Jeff Shantz describes layered policing as, “In response to community calls to defund police and fund necessary social resources, cities across the country have instituted “layered policing.” From Lethbridge to Saskatoon to Kitchener-Waterloo, these moves would actually deploy more police throughout the community, and embed policing in everyday social life.”

In January 2021, in response to community calls for the police to get out of mental health crisis response, the Ottawa Police Service presented the Ottawa Police Services Board with its initiative to create an alternative mental health crisis response system. The OPS said they had brought together a group of partner organizations to lead the initiative called the Guiding Council. The only problem was, they hadn’t told some of the partner organizations, including the Ottawa Black Mental Health Coalition of which the 613-819 Black Hub was a member. 

After yet another public outcry at the OPS leading such an initiative, the OPS agreed to have it moved under the management of the City. However, instead of removing themselves from any leadership role in the initiative, as the public demanded, they did exactly the opposite and joined the Guiding Council which they weren’t on when they first created it. We later learned that the Guiding Council would, in consultation with the City, decide which community groups get $2 million dollars of the $3 million cut from the OPS’ requested $14 million dollar 2022 budget increase. 

The Guiding Council is yet another place where the OPS appears to be pushing for a mental health crisis response system that still has lots of police involvement and zero impact on their annual multi-million dollar budget increases. The OPS’ influence is already clear in the Guiding Council’s terms of reference which aims for a system that still sends cops, “when the crisis is linked to criminal activity”. Wouldn’t that include a situation like Abdirahman Abdi who people called the cops on because he was allegedly touching women in a coffee shop? And wouldn’t that still include a situation like Greg Ritchie, an Indigenous man who people called the cops on because they said they saw a man with a knife that turned out to be a ceremonial tomahawk? Yes it would. Abdi and Greg would likely end up just as dead under the system currently being proposed by the Guiding Council.

The OPS influence is also clear by the lack of any mention in the Guiding Council’s terms of reference of either the 613-819 Black Hub’s alternative non-police mental health crisis response report or Toronto’s non-police mental health crisis response teams it launched in March 2022. 

The recently released report, Troubling Encounters: Ottawa Residents’ Experience of Policing, confirmed that racialized and low income Ottawa residents have extremely low levels of trust in the Ottawa police. In fact, the report states, “In short, for many people in this city, police do not contribute to individual or community safety, in fact, they appear to do the very opposite.” Allowing the police to remain on the Guiding Council will further erode what little trust there is – and further erode Black Ottawa residents’ mental health.

For the next Black mental health conference Blackademics should engage Blacktivists in the early planning stages so the conference deals more fully with the impact of carceral systems like policing, courts and jails – and has concrete suggestions for where activists should focus their advocacy.

Categories
Mental health NRTs OPS

2021 wins

The 613-819 Black Hub’s strategic plan starts with this:

Good evaluation is hard in any field but especially hard regarding advocacy because:

  1. Success can take years;
  2. Many people, groups contribute to success so it’s hard to evaluate the impact of your organization;
  3. There is often an active opposition working against you; and
  4. Good evaluation can be prohibitively expensive (i.e. measuring changes in public opinion).

Despite these challenges, advocacy work can, and must, be measured to:

  1. Know if strategies are working; and
  2. Demonstrate success to Black communities, potential recruits and funders.

Many people only consider final outcomes like successful policy change as “wins” but there are many other types of success that are important to measure to maintain optimism – and momentum. This post describes two big wins, and one partial win, that we lead or participated in during 2021 – and how we plan to follow up on each of them in 2022.

Compassion not Cops – In February 2021, we launched our Compassion not Cops campaign to produce a proposal for an alternative, non-police mental health crisis response system for Ottawa. We raised $25,000 in three months to pay the consultants who produced an excellent report that people continue to reference in efforts to freeze the Ottawa Police Service budget.

Getting cops out of Ottawa schools – We supported the Asilu Collective which led the successful campaign to get cops out of Ottawa schools by ending the Ottawa police’s School Resource Program. While Asilu members maintained pressure on Ottawa Carleton District School Board trustees by regularly presenting at Board meetings, we continued to raise the issue during our many presentations to the Ottawa Police Services Board. We also joined Asilu members on the OCDSB’s Review of Police Involvement in Schools working group.

Freezing the Ottawa Police Service budget – We joined many other groups in leading a year-long campaign to freeze the Ottawa Police Service budget. We presented almost every month at Ottawa Police Services Board meetings, applied pressure by demanding answers of the OPS via email and Freedom of Information requests and had supporters calling and emailing city councillors right up until the day councillors voted on the budget. In the end, the Board and council didn’t freeze the OPS budget. They gave the OPS an $11 million increase instead of the $14 million the OPS asked for. Many saw this as a loss but it wasn’t as it was the first crucial step in making any big change: legitimizing the idea that it can even happen. The $3 million reduction showed for the first time that the Board could give the cops less than they ask for.

Another success related to the police budget was the City Hall sit-in organized by the Ottawa Black Diaspora Coalition during City council’s vote on the police budget. The sit-in showed you don’t need lots of people to produce very powerful symbolic moments. One of those moments was when one of the OBDC sisters – who’s about 6ft 2 – started speaking with a megaphone right after city officials – backed up by the presence of several police officers – told the organizers they couldn’t use a megaphone. As soon as they started speaking, a police officer approached and said something to them. They stopped speaking, looked down at the officer without saying anything – then turned back to the crowd and continued speaking with the megaphone. The officer melted into the background. I spoke after them, also with the megaphone – and said that I hoped that, by risking being arrested, I would inspire young brothers and sisters to rise to a new level of militancy.

In 2022 we plan to follow up on all these successes.

Compassion not Cops – We launched the Compassion not Cops campaign partly in response to the Ottawa Police Service launching a process to create an alternative mental health response system. The problem is the police were leading it, including handpicking the “Guiding Council” that would manage the project. When we and others raised this, the OPS quickly agreed to let the City lead the process. Only they didn’t. After much asking, we got a copy of the Guiding Council’s terms of reference and saw that the OPS was now on the Guiding Council.

At the Nov. 2020 Ottawa Police Services Board meeting OPS Chief Peter Sloly made it very clear that the OPS would be at any table creating an alternative mental health response system – he just failed to mention that they were now back at the head of that table. We responded by saying that we did think there was a role for the OPS in developing an alternative, non-police mental health response system. It’s similar to the role an abusive husband plays when his wife finally decides to leave him. He needs to be around to give her the keys to the house and the car and the wifi password – but he will absolutely not be at the table with her team that will help her design her new life without him.

Chief Sloly and the police union, the Ottawa Police Association, called the police Board and City Council’s decision to give the OPS an $11 million raise a “cut”. Why would the Chief and the OPA say that? They’d say it because they know that, because the Board and Council didn’t cut large amounts from their budget and free it up to go to things that actually keep us safer, like mental health programs – that the crises will keep happening – and then the OPS can say, “You see what happens when you cut our budget?” – and ask for an even bigger increase next year. In 2022, we will use our Compassion not Cops study to counter this narrative.

Cops in schools and the police budget – Succeeding in getting cops out of schools was a huge success. Keeping them out will require continued vigilance as we fully expect the OPS to try to maintain its connection to schools through some form of layered policing.

In his March 2021 Spring magazine article, Layered policing’ expands police amid calls to defund, Jeff Shantz said:

In response to community calls to defund police and fund necessary social resources, cities across the country have instituted “layered policing.” From Lethbridge to Saskatoon to Kitchener-Waterloo, these moves would actually deploy more police throughout the community, and embed policing in everyday social life. All while presenting a model in which social services are framed as policing functions (or policing “partnerships”).

We expect the OPS will push for continued strong involvement in the mental health response system, framed as “partnerships” with social service agencies, while fighting any reductions to their budget that would free up money to go to these “partner” agencies. We also see them attempting to continue to try to deploy more cops in the community under the guise of the Neighborhood Resource Team program, which is their latest name for “community policing”.

The OPS NRT program has gone from $2.5 million and 18 officers in 2019 to over $11 million and 89 officers in 2021. And the OPS is currently leading an evaluation of the program that’s pretty much guaranteed to conclude that the program is great and should be further expanded. The project started in fall 2019 when the OPS hired Carleton professor Linda Duxbury to lead it. After we found out about the project, we met with Duxbury and asked her why no Black groups were included in the project description for her project on the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council website (SSHRC gave her almost $200,000 for the project). She said she had included Indigenous groups.

Duxbury’s NRT project is yet another example of the OPS ensuring that anything that’s meant to hold them accountable, or evaluate them, produces positive reviews they use to justify asking the Board and City Council for more money. We will continue to expose this in 2022 in the run up to the vote on the OPS’ 2023 budget – and the Oct. 2022 Ottawa municipal election.

We will also work to have similar successes in 2022 in areas beyond policing by increasing our efforts to connect with – and be guided by – community members most affected by the systems we’re trying to change.

La lutta continua.